Don’t Play the Fool: Litigation with a Pro Se Party

April 8, 2025

Reading time: 3 minutes

“He who represents himself has a fool for a client,” is a quote which Abraham Lincoln is often credited. Growing up in Mr. Lincoln’s hometown of Springfield, Illinois, you could count on an annual elementary school field trip to one of the many Lincoln historical sites, including his home, law offices, and even the Lincoln Tomb. Despite these many visits, I never heard the origin story of this quote. But if I had to guess, President Lincoln shared a similar experience many of us have encountered in our legal careers – the pro se litigant.

The reasons why someone may choose not to hire a lawyer vary widely – from the expense alone to the belief they are best-positioned to plead their case. As lawyers, we know the dangers of self-representation, as well as the headache it can be to litigate with an unrepresented party. Regardless of the merits of the pro se party’s case or the incessant leniency being shown to them by the judge, always take the high road to protect yourself and your client. And, take care that you aren’t the fool in the case by following these tips:

  • Effectuate Good Service – Although pro se litigants are required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (along with the state and local rules) just like parties represented by counsel, you may find that the judge will be somewhat lenient in this first step of the litigation process. So, rather than arguing over the validity of the signature on your certified mail, personally serve the self-represented party and have the process server’s affidavit ready to produce in court if service is contested.
  • Follow The Rules – Make sure you follow the court rules to the letter. Courts may allow pro se litigants more leeway in following court rules, but that flexibility and courtesy will most likely not be extended to a person with a law degree. So, leave no room for their argument that you were not in full compliance.
  • Document Everything – As the saying goes, “If it’s not in writing, it didn’t happen.” While this is hopefully already a hallmark of your practice, confirm any phone conversations in writing. Or better yet, only communicate with the pro se party via e-mails and letters. Keep your correspondence concise and avoid using confusing legalese so your words are not misconstrued or misinterpreted.

While dealing with a pro se litigant can be frustrating, you must also be mindful of potential ethical issues, namely, the potential for confusion about who you represent. ABA Model Rule 4.3 governs dealing with a self-represented person. Specifically, it provides that when communicating with an unrepresented person on behalf of your client, a lawyer is prohibited from stating or implying that the lawyer is disinterested. In other words, to avoid any misunderstanding, you must identify your client and explain that their interests are opposed to those of the unrepresented person. Further, if you know (or reasonably should know) the pro se litigant misunderstands your role, you must make reasonable efforts to correct that misunderstanding. In communicating with a self-represented party, avoid providing legal advice and inadvertently creating an attorney-client relationship. When answering what may appear to be innocuous questions, be sure to reiterate (in writing) who you represent and that you are not providing any legal advice to the pro se party.


Additional Ethics content

Ethics

While you may initially think these practices will be too time consuming to add in your already busy schedule, thoughtfully managing your calendar can also serve as an opportunity to update (and appropriately bill) your clients.

Ethics

Like the badges you may have earned and proudly worn on your scout uniform, the cases you accept and litigate must have merit. But what does it mean to have a meritorious claim or contention? ABA Model Rule 3.1 states, in pertinent part, that “a lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.” Let’s dig into this s’more. 

Ethics

Like Google, “Prime” has now achieved the enviable syntactic conversion to a verb, as in, “Can you Prime it?” Nowadays, if the shipping time for your online order is longer than two days, it might as well be a lifetime. Yet, attorneys must also expedite delivery of their services. Specifically, Rule 3.2 of the ABA Model Rules requires lawyers to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.

Information provided by AttPro Ally is not intended as legal advice. This publication provides best practices for use in connection with general circumstances and ordinarily does not address specific situations. Specific situations should be discussed with legal counsel licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction. By publishing practice and risk prevention tips, Attorney Protective neither implies nor provides any guarantee that claims can be prevented by the use of the suggested practices. Though the contents of AttPro Ally have been carefully researched, Attorney Protective makes no warranty as to its accuracy, applicability, or timeliness. Anyone wishing to reproduce any part of the AttPro Ally content must request permission from Attorney Protective by calling 877-728-8776 or sending an email to cs@attorneyprotective.com.

© 2025 AttPro Ally. All rights reserved.