Catch Me If You Can: Imposters Target Real Estate Transactions
December 20, 2023
Reading time: 3 minutes
Though it may seem hard to believe, this is happening and at a significant cost. Today, scammers are patient and increasingly sophisticated making the red flags harder to see. They request and sign engagement agreements and provide what appear to be legitimate, notarized documents. So, what steps can be taken to avoid becoming a victim of this new scheme?
- Verify the address and phone number provided – This may mean having an investigator confirm the purported client’s local address in person. Although it may seem simple, see if you can contact the client at the phone number associated with the address they provide.
- Perform due diligence on the real property – Consider hiring an investigator or have someone in your office visit the real property and pull all the property records, including assessor records, related to the property to review for any inconsistencies.
- Analyze signatures – Compare signatures on the various documents your client provides. If they have the documents “notarized,” verify the identity of the notary and contact them by phone to confirm they are legitimate.
- Closely monitor the wire instructions and transaction – Any discrepancies with the delivery of the wire instructions should set off an alarm in your mind. For example, last minute changes to the instructions and any notice from the bank concerning issues with the wire should raise a red flag. If you find yourself attempting multiple wire transfers, it may be too late.
- Create and utilize a verification protocol – Have another attorney or paralegal go over the file and any correspondence related to the transaction with a fine-tooth comb. The language used by the “client” may not have seemed odd to you at first, but another set of eyes may question it. See if your bank has any fraud prevention protocols in place or if it can check account numbers before the actual transaction occurs.
- Conduct the closing in person – While an “old-school” approach, closing the deal in person may be the most risk-averse way to ensure your client is who they say they are. Although not as convenient as an electronic closing, if you have any question in your mind as to the validity of the documents provided or the circumstances surrounding the transaction, require the parties to appear in your office.
You simply cannot be too careful when it comes to real estate transactions, especially those involving wire transfers. Although it is easy to be lulled into thinking the transaction is above board, stay vigilant and trust your instincts.
Additional Practice Areas content
Lions and Tigers and Bears, Oh My! – Avoiding Legal Malpractice Traps In Your Workers’ Comp Case
Workers' Compensation
Like the badges you may have earned and proudly worn on your scout uniform, the cases you accept and litigate must have merit. But what does it mean to have a meritorious claim or contention? ABA Model Rule 3.1 states, in pertinent part, that “a lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.” Let’s dig into this s’more.
Scout’s Honor: Advancing Meritorious Claims In Your Personal Injury Practice
Personal Injury
Like the badges you may have earned and proudly worn on your scout uniform, the cases you accept and litigate must have merit. But what does it mean to have a meritorious claim or contention? ABA Model Rule 3.1 states, in pertinent part, that “a lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.” Let’s dig into this s’more.
New SCOTUS Opinion: Unpacking the Connelly Decision and What it Means for Lawyers
Trust and Estate
The United States Supreme Court recently decided Connelly v. United States, No. 23-146, holding that a corporation’s obligation to redeem shares upon the death of a shareholder is not a liability that reduces the corporation’s value for purposes of the federal estate tax. What does this mean for practitioners counseling their business clients?
Information provided by AttPro Ally is not intended as legal advice. This publication provides best practices for use in connection with general circumstances and ordinarily does not address specific situations. Specific situations should be discussed with legal counsel licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction. By publishing practice and risk prevention tips, Attorney Protective neither implies nor provides any guarantee that claims can be prevented by the use of the suggested practices. Though the contents of AttPro Ally have been carefully researched, Attorney Protective makes no warranty as to its accuracy, applicability, or timeliness. Anyone wishing to reproduce any part of the AttPro Ally content must request permission from Attorney Protective by calling 877-728-8776 or sending an email to [email protected].
© 2024 AttPro Ally. All rights reserved.