16 Tips to Nail Your Next Remote Deposition or Hearing
Esquire Depositions Solutions
March 17, 2022
Reading time: 7 minutes
The American Bar Association’s Litigation Section recently gathered two experienced virtual advocates and one judge to discuss their experiences handling remote depositions and virtual trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lessons they dispensed were the product of hard-earned experiences in early 2020 – the pioneering days of virtual proceedings. Some were earned through practice and preparation, some were pleasant surprises, and some were mistakes they will not make twice. Here are 16 actionable takeaways from their remarks.
- Zoom fatigue is real Virtual proceedings are challenging for everyone involved. It is easy for witnesses and fact-finders to lose focus after several hours of watching a computer screen. “You are asking a lot when you ask your fact-finder to sit and pay attention while staring at a screen for eight hours a day,” Tynan Buthod, partner at Baker Botts LLP Houston, warns. “As a trial lawyer, it is incumbent on you to make sure that you are delivering the case in the clearest, most straightforward way which includes the use of documents and efficient time with witnesses.” That may require taking more breaks than needed for an in person proceeding in order to keep the audience’s attention.
- Plan ahead for exhibits “Think about how you’re going to handle exhibits in advance. If you’ve had trials in the courtroom, you know how long it takes to prep for exhibits,” Kathleen B. Campbell, a partner at Manko Gold Katcher Fox LLP advises. Her advice is to double or triple the length of time it will take to deal with exhibits in a virtual hearing.
- Project a compelling image According to Hon. Robert M. Spector, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, “Litigators are not well-served by cameras set up to capture several people at the same time.” He advises that although a lawyer may think that being in a conference room with three other partners or with the client is a good thing, when the camera is 20 feet away, it is difficult to see anyone. Therefore, it is better to be in separate rooms, with separate devices, so that each person can be seen and heard clearly.
- Help the court reporter record the proceedings It can be difficult for the court reporter to accurately track who is saying what in a virtual environment. When the court, the attorneys, and the witness are all in separate screen windows, it is not always clear whose voice is connected to the images on the screen. Securing a good record and preserving errors in a virtual environment is a critical task that should not be overlooked.
- Establish ground rules and expectations Buthod relays that he begins remote depositions with a series of questions to the witness that are designed to enforce the integrity of the proceeding. He asks the same questions after every break as well:
- Who is in the room with you?
- What documents are in front of you?
- Can we agree that you will tell me if someone joins you in the room?
- Is there anything that is distracting you?
- Do not hide behind PowerPoint A PowerPoint slide deck, if given a prominent role, can push the attorney into a small box off to the side of the screen – not the best vantage point from which to deliver an argument. This set-up may prevent the attorney from making good contact with the fact-finder.
- What was forgivable in 2020 is not anymore Tales of virtual lawyering during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic included accounts of attorneys seen on-screen in their pajamas or other less-than-professional attire. Many were clearly, and unapologetically, challenged by videoconferencing technologies. That behavior is no longer appreciated. “Fourteen months later, it’s not funny anymore,” Judge Spector opines. “So I think that you have to know the platform and be ready for it.”
- Be disciplined when asking questions Long-winded or ambiguous questions are difficult to process under the best of circumstances. When in a virtual environment, the odds that a question is misunderstood by the witness, or that the witness’s answer is misunderstood by the attorney, go up significantly. “Doing a trial by Zoom was a lot like taking a deposition when you have a translator,” Buthod shares. “It forces you to shorten your questions. It forces you to make sure that your question is a clear yes or no. That is, “What is it that I’m after?”
- Your conference room is the courtroom Attorneys should behave in whatever room is being used to participate in a virtual proceeding in the same way that they would behave in a courtroom. In other words, there should be no multitasking, no checking messages, no eating, and no conversing informally with associates.
- Pin the judge, minimize the witnesses Campbell relays that it has been helpful to her to give the judge a prominent position on her computer screen, while minimizing the views of witnesses and others. “I was looking at the judge as I was questioning my witness,” she said. “And I could pick up on his overall demeanor, when he was taking notes, when he seemed bored, and when he seemed particularly interested. And it really helped me cater my line of questioning accordingly. Also, when cross-examining an opposing witness, give the witness prominent screen real estate. I recommend pinning the witness that you’re cross-examining. Look into the camera directly. Typically the witness that you’re questioning is going to be really up close. If you can establish that it’s the two of you in the room that can be really effective.”
- Is your witness ready for a close-up? The technology used in virtual depositions and trials allows the fact-finder to get a really close look at witnesses. Facial expressions that might have been missed in a courtroom are captured in detail by the camera. “If we’re in a courtroom, I can’t see a witness the way I can see them on Zoom,” Judge Spector said. “On Zoom, I can really see facial expressions. I can see somebody roll their eyes. I can hear them sigh. Everything you do can be seen close-up and personal and you can’t get away with things you may have been able to get away within a courtroom.”
- Place witnesses in distraction-free environments If a witness is testifying from home or some other environment not under the attorney’s control, then that witness should be told to testify from a location free from distractions. They should appear professional and undistracted on screen just as they would in front of a court or in front of a jury. “I don’t ever need to see the place where somebody else sleeps, that’s just too private, too personal,” Buthod remarked. “I find that a rotating fan on somebody’s ceiling or other things in the background are distracting. Or you find yourself saying, “Man, I wonder if those are his kids? How old is that picture?” All those things can only serve to keep the fact-finder distracted.
- Virtual is here to stay Virtual proceedings are not favored by many litigators. They prefer in-person proceedings where they can connect closely with witnesses and fact-finders. That connection can be difficult to achieve online without practice in front of a camera. “There is a lot that we used to do in-person that we just don’t have to do in-person anymore,” Buthod acknowledges. “It’s harder to take a deposition. It’s hard to have a lot of contested hearings. But there are so many occasions where we can do those things virtually and save our clients’ time and money.” In-person may be more comfortable, but virtual is here to stay.
- Courts will modify the rules for a good reason Do not assume that published court procedures are not subject to modification. Would you like your witness to testify without a mask? Would you like to address the court without a mask? If COVID-19 vaccination numbers are high, or if you have opposing counsel’s agreement, the court may very well grant your request. “I would not shy away from asking the court to modify things as we move forward,” Judge Spector said. “We’re trying to be responsive to the current situation, but that situation is ever-changing.” Judge Spector also advised attorneys to ask judges which format they preferred to receive documents and exhibits “” paper or electronic. Some judges have gone entirely paperless. For those judges, paper filings are a burden.
- Wear one hat: lawyer Attorneys should focus on delivering high-quality advocacy for their clients. Leave technical matters to an assistant, if possible. “Your job is to examine and cross-examine witnesses. Hire a video technician, hire the right person to handle your documents, and rely on them so that you’re not stammering through your virtual trial, showing your ineptitude at something that you don’t need to do. You need to have somebody else that’s able to do that for you.” advises Buthod.
- 16. Learn and prepare diligently “In order to zealously represent your client today, you need to learn the technology,” Campbell counsels. “Lawyers tend to not be the best at technology, but we do not have a choice. In the same way you prep for regular trial in a courtroom, you’ve got to prepare, prepare, prepare. If so, you’ll do a great job.”
Additional Personal Development content
By Sam Rosenthal For many in the legal profession, the term “lawyer mental health” may seem contradictory. The demanding hours […]
French philosopher Blaise Pascal once famously apologized to a friend for the length of a letter, saying “I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.” Cutting excess and distilling your message to the core takes care and effort.
Lawyers are in the business of communication and persuasion, and poor, imprecise, or even sloppy writing diminishes our abilities to effectively communicate and persuade. But if simply being better at two of the most important aspects of your job isn’t motivation enough, consider the costly consequences of poor legal writing. For example, one professional negligence insurer in the United Kingdom revealed that drafting errors by lawyers accounted for one out of every eight claims. And in a LexisNexis survey, 33% of respondents admitted to skipping proofreading on a regular basis. Drafting errors can change the meaning of a sentence, create ambiguities, and lead to both litigation and reputational damage for lawyers. Unfortunately, the case law abounds with cautionary tales.
Information provided by AttPro Ally is not intended as legal advice. This publication provides best practices for use in connection with general circumstances and ordinarily does not address specific situations. Specific situations should be discussed with legal counsel licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction. By publishing practice and risk prevention tips, Attorney Protective neither implies nor provides any guarantee that claims can be prevented by the use of the suggested practices. Though the contents of AttPro Ally have been carefully researched, Attorney Protective makes no warranty as to its accuracy, applicability, or timeliness. Anyone wishing to reproduce any part of the AttPro Ally content must request permission from Attorney Protective by calling 877-728-8776 or sending an email to [email protected].
© 2023 AttPro Ally. All rights reserved.